In-Depth Research Analysis:
1 Executive Summary:
The Core Thesis:
This report addresses a key question: why has gold failed to consistently behave like a traditional safe-haven asset amid escalating tensions in the Middle East, and why did it even decline at one stage?
Our core view is that gold is not a “single-factor safe-haven asset” driven only by geopolitical stress. Instead, it is a macro asset jointly priced by real interest rates, the US dollar, inflation expectations, and the broader global credit environment. In the short term, this latest conflict was not primarily priced by the market as a pure flight-to-safety event. Instead, it was more quickly translated into higher oil prices, renewed inflation concerns, delayed rate-cut expectations, and a stronger dollar, all of which put pressure on gold.
More importantly, gold is usually negatively correlated with real interest rates because gold yields no income, while real rates represent the opportunity cost of holding it. However, since 2022, that relationship has become less stable. On the surface, continued central bank buying has provided support. At a deeper level, the changing global macro landscape suggests that gold is increasingly being used to reprice long-term concerns around US dollar credibility and the global reserve system.
Therefore, gold’s recent decline does not necessarily invalidate its longer-term role. Rather, it suggests that short-term pricing power has shifted back toward real rates and the dollar. To understand gold properly, Market participants typically look beyond the conflict itself and focus on how such events reshape expectations f[NA1] or interest rates, inflation, and the global credit backdrop.
2 Why Did Gold Fall Even as the Middle East Became More Turbulent?
What has made gold’s recent performance so confusing for many investors is that it seems to challenge one of the market’s most deeply ingrained assumptions: the more severe the geopolitical tension, the more gold should rise. For a long time, gold has occupied a near-instinctive position in the public mind as a classic safe-haven asset. War, sanctions, political confrontation, and financial instability almost automatically lead investors to think of gold. It is therefore understandable that, as tensions in the Middle East intensified, fears over energy transit increased, and oil prices turned more volatile, many investors expected gold to move into a sustained rally.
But the market has delivered a more complex—and more realistic—answer. A Reuters commentary published on March 26 noted that in the days following a major geopolitical escalation, gold fell by nearly 4%, while some defense-related assets also retreated. The article described this pattern in a simple but important way: when geopolitical shocks first hit, markets often do not trade the “obvious” narrative immediately. Instead, investors first raise cash, rebalance positions, and only then begin to reprice risk. That observation captures the essence of what happened this time: the actual sequence of market reactions is often very different from the first instinct of retail investors.
To understand this, one must begin with a basic point: while gold does have safe-haven characteristics, it is not an asset that rises simply because fear increases. Gold is also a highly financialized macro asset. It responds not only to geopolitical developments, but also to the direction of the US dollar, real interest rates, inflation expectations, and broader liquidity conditions. When conflict escalates, if markets focus first on the possibility of higher energy prices, renewed inflationary pressure, and a more hawkish path for monetary policy, then gold may fail to benefit in the short run—and may even come under pressure.
This is precisely the most counterintuitive aspect of the current episode. The market has not been trading “war” in a simplistic sense. It has been trading how war might alter the macro framework. If the conflict raises the risk of disruption in key energy routes such as the Strait of Hormuz, then investors immediately begin asking a different set of questions: could inflation reaccelerate, could Federal Reserve rate cuts be pushed further out, and could the dollar strengthen again? As long as those questions point toward tighter financial conditions, gold—as a non-yielding asset—can struggle in the short term. This is fully consistent with the transmission mechanism we highlighted in our previous oil report: when energy transit risk rises, the first effect is often a higher geopolitical risk premium in oil, which then feeds into inflation expectations, interest-rate expectations, and asset revaluation more broadly.
Recent market behavior reflects this mechanism clearly. Reuters reported on March 25 that gold surged by nearly 2% in a single session, not simply because geopolitical tensions remained high, but because a pullback in oil prices eased fears of persistently higher interest rates, thereby lowering the opportunity cost of holding gold. Then on March 27, gold rebounded again as bargain hunters stepped in after the previous decline, even as investors continued to assess whether tensions in the Middle East might ease. This tells us that markets were not steadily and mechanically “buying gold for safety.” Instead, they were continuously weighing two competing forces: on one side, safe-haven demand driven by geopolitical risk; on the other, the pressure from oil prices, inflation concerns, the US dollar, and higher real rates. Gold moved according to whichever side was stronger at a given moment.
This means that gold’s recent decline does not imply that it has lost its safe-haven role, nor does it suggest that its long-term investment case has been broken. A more accurate interpretation is that during this round of conflict, short-term pricing power shifted away from pure geopolitical fear and back toward real rates and the dollar. The market did not reject gold altogether; rather, it temporarily treated gold as an asset whose near-term performance is more sensitive to opportunity cost than to headlines alone. That is why the latest escalation failed to produce the kind of straight-line rally that many investors had expected.
Historical patterns suggest that gold’s safe-haven characteristics are not unconditional. Whether gold rises during a specific geopolitical shock depends on how the market translates that shock into macro variables. If the market interprets the event as leading to tighter financial conditions, a stronger dollar, and higher real yields, gold may weaken in the short term. If instead the event is interpreted as increasing systemic risk, undermining confidence, or pushing policy in a more accommodative direction, gold is more likely to strengthen. In other words, gold does not react to the headline itself; it reacts to the macro transmission mechanism behind the headline.
That is also the central question for the rest of this report: how exactly is gold priced? Why is it usually negatively correlated with real interest rates? Why did that relationship weaken after 2022, and why has it reasserted itself again during this latest episode?
3 How Is Gold Actually Priced?
Viewing gold purely as a “safe-haven asset” often leads to misinterpretation, especially in complex market environments like the current one. To understand why gold rises in some geopolitical events but weakens in others, it is necessary to place gold within a broader macro pricing framework.
At its core, gold is not driven by a single factor. Instead, it is jointly influenced by interest rates, the US dollar, inflation expectations, and the structure of demand. Among these, the most fundamental—and often underappreciated—variable is the real interest rate.
3.1 Why Is Gold Typically Negatively Correlated with Real Interest Rates?
This relationship can be understood through a very simple starting point: gold does not generate income.
Unlike bonds, which provide coupon payments, holding gold does not produce any yield. As a result, investors constantly face a trade-off in asset allocation—whether to hold gold or to hold income-generating assets such as government bonds. The key to this decision lies in the difference in returns.
Real interest rates represent the return on an asset after adjusting for inflation. In other words, they reflect the “real yield” investors can earn from holding risk-free assets such as US Treasuries. From this perspective, real rates can be understood as the opportunity cost of holding gold.
When real interest rates rise, the real return on bonds increases. In comparison, gold—being a non-yielding asset—becomes less attractive, and capital tends to shift toward income-generating assets, putting downward pressure on gold prices. Conversely, when real rates decline or turn negative, the opportunity cost of holding gold falls, making gold more attractive as a store of value.
This mechanism is one of the most important foundations for understanding gold’s short- to medium-term price movements. It also explains why, over long periods, gold prices have exhibited a relatively stable negative correlation with US real interest rates.
3.2 Why Is the US Dollar Also a Key Pricing Factor?
In addition to real rates, the US dollar is another critical variable that must be considered.
Gold is priced in US dollars, which means that movements in the dollar directly affect gold’s performance. When the dollar strengthens, gold becomes more expensive for investors using other currencies, which tends to suppress demand. At the same time, stronger dollar assets often attract global capital, diverting flows away from gold.
As a result, gold’s price movements are often not driven purely by risk sentiment, but by the combination of interest rates and the dollar. Rising real rates together with a stronger dollar typically create the most direct headwinds for gold, while a weaker dollar and declining rates tend to provide support.
In this sense, gold is not merely a hedge against risk events; it is also a form of hedge within the dollar-based financial system. This characteristic becomes particularly important in periods when global capital flows are highly sensitive to changes in monetary conditions.
3.3 Why Has Gold Become Less Sensitive to Real Rates Since 2022?
Based on the framework above, one might expect that persistently high US real interest rates over the past two years would have exerted significant downward pressure on gold. However, in reality, gold performed strongly between 2022 and 2025, even reaching multiple record highs.
Rather than indicating a breakdown in the traditional relationship, this divergence suggests that additional, higher-level forces have entered the pricing mechanism of gold.
The first, more visible factor is the structural support from central bank buying. In recent years, central banks have steadily increased their gold reserves, changing the composition of demand in the gold market. Compared to ETF flows or trading-driven demand, central bank purchases tend to be more stable and long-term in nature, thereby reducing gold’s sensitivity to short-term fluctuations in interest rates.
More importantly, however, is a deeper structural shift in the global macro environment. Gold is increasingly being used to price uncertainty in monetary credibility and the global reserve system.
In the previous era of low inflation and low interest rates, gold was primarily viewed as a hedge against inflation or financial crises. In the current environment, characterized by rising global debt levels, increasing geopolitical frictions, and elevated sanction risks, some countries have begun to reassess the composition of their foreign exchange reserves and increase the share of gold.
In this process, gold is gradually evolving from a passive safe-haven asset into a more active hedge against long-term credit and currency risks. As a result, its pricing is no longer determined solely by short-term interest rates, but also reflects concerns about the stability of the global monetary system. This helps explain why gold has remained resilient even in a high real-rate environment.
3.4 Why Has Gold Shifted Back to a Rate-Driven Regime in This Episode?
If the past few years have seen an increased role for structural demand and credit considerations in gold pricing, the current Middle East conflict provides a clear example of how, under certain conditions, the market can revert to a more traditional, rate-driven framework.
The key reason is that this episode was not initially interpreted by the market as a pure systemic risk event. Instead, it was more quickly translated into an energy and inflation shock. When oil price expectations rise and inflation concerns intensify, market expectations for monetary policy tend to adjust accordingly—rate cuts may be delayed, and the projected path of interest rates may shift higher.
In such an environment, expected real rates rise, increasing the opportunity cost of holding gold. At the same time, the US dollar often strengthens amid uncertainty, adding further downward pressure on gold prices. As a result, even as geopolitical risks remain elevated, gold can weaken in the short term.
Therefore, the recent pullback in gold does not signal a reversal of its long-term investment thesis. Rather, it reflects a temporary shift in pricing power—from structural and credit-driven factors back toward interest rates and the US dollar.
4 Why Has the Market Prioritized “Reflation” over “Safe Haven” in This Episode?
Conventional wisdom suggests that geopolitical conflicts should directly trigger safe-haven flows, supporting assets such as gold. However, during the current escalation in the Middle East, gold’s short-term performance has deviated from this pattern. Instead of strengthening consistently, the market has shifted its focus more rapidly toward inflation dynamics and the expected path of interest rates.
To understand this divergence, it is essential to distinguish between the event itself and the macroeconomic variables it influences. Markets do not price geopolitical events in isolation; they price the economic consequences that may arise from them.
4.1 The Primary Transmission Channel Runs Through Energy and Inflation, Not Risk Sentiment Alone
The macro relevance of the current Middle East tensions lies less in the scale of the conflict itself and more in its potential spillover effects—particularly on energy supply and transportation.
Once concerns emerge around the stability of key transit routes, market attention shifts quickly to oil prices. Rising energy prices not only increase cost pressures but, more importantly, can reignite inflation expectations. In an environment where inflation has moderated but remains uncertain, changes in energy prices tend to have an amplified effect on market expectations.
In this transmission process, the market typically adjusts its inflation outlook first, followed by expectations for monetary policy, and only then reflects these changes across asset prices. As a result, the initial object of pricing is not gold or other safe-haven assets, but rather interest rates and inflation expectations.
4.2 Reflation Trades Take Precedence over Safe-Haven Flows
Market behavior during this episode suggests that the initial response has been closer to a “reflation trade” rather than a traditional safe-haven shift.
A reflation trade refers to a scenario in which markets reassess the risk of rising inflation and adjust expectations for monetary policy accordingly. In this framework, the key concern is not the risk event itself, but whether it leads to a higher and more persistent inflation environment, and consequently a prolonged period of elevated interest rates.
When the conflict is interpreted as a factor that may push oil prices higher and reinforce inflation persistence, several adjustments tend to follow:
Expectations for rate cuts are pushed further out
The projected policy rate path is revised upward
Real rate expectations rise
The US dollar remains relatively firm
These changes create direct headwinds for gold. As a non-yielding asset, gold becomes less attractive when real interest rates rise, as the opportunity cost of holding it increases. Consequently, even in the presence of heightened geopolitical risk, gold can come under short-term pressure when reflation dynamics dominate.
4.3 Interest Rates and the Dollar Are Priced More Immediately and with Greater Clarity
In the early stages of a geopolitical shock, markets tend to prioritize variables that are more quantifiable and can be incorporated quickly into pricing models. In contrast, safe-haven demand typically develops with a degree of path dependency, often requiring further escalation or clearer signs of systemic risk before generating sustained capital inflows.
Interest rate expectations and the US dollar, by comparison, are more immediately responsive. Oil prices, inflation data, and central bank communication can be rapidly translated into changes in rate expectations. These changes, in turn, are quickly reflected in currency markets through capital flows.
Geopolitical developments, however, often evolve in a non-linear manner, oscillating between escalation and de-escalation. In such an environment, market participants tend to focus on variables with greater visibility and measurability—namely interest rates and the dollar—rather than attempting to price uncertain geopolitical outcomes directly. This preference contributes to the dominance of opportunity-cost dynamics in gold’s short-term pricing.
4.4 Liquidity and Positioning Effects Can Amplify Short-Term Moves
In addition to macro factors, market structure and positioning also play an important role in shaping short-term price movements.
Following a period of strong performance, gold has accumulated a degree of unrealized gains. In times of increased volatility, investors often prioritize adjustments in highly liquid assets to manage risk or raise cash. Gold, as a liquid and widely held asset, may therefore be among the first to be reduced in portfolios.
Such behavior does not necessarily reflect a reassessment of gold’s long-term value. Rather, it is often a function of portfolio rebalancing and liquidity management. In the early phase of market stress, investors typically focus on stabilizing liquidity conditions before gradually reallocating toward defensive assets.
4.5 Summary: A Shift in Short-Term Pricing Priority, Not a Structural Breakdown
Taken together, gold’s recent performance can be understood as a shift in pricing priority rather than a breakdown of its underlying investment thesis.
In the initial phase of the conflict, markets did not prioritize safe-haven demand. Instead, they focused on the implications for inflation and interest rate expectations. As a result, rising real rates and a stronger dollar exerted more immediate pressure on gold.
The recent pullback in gold should therefore be viewed as a temporary shift in pricing power—from safe-haven demand toward interest rates and the US dollar—rather than a fundamental change in its long-term role within asset allocation.
5 How to Frame Gold’s Investment Logic in the Current Macro Environment
Based on the preceding analysis, gold’s pricing framework can be clearly structured across time horizons: in the short term, it is dominated by real interest rates and the US dollar; in the medium term, it depends on the direction of policy expectations; and in the long term, it is anchored in the evolution of global credit conditions and the monetary system.
Within this framework, gold’s recent volatility does not reflect a lack of underlying logic. Rather, it reflects a shift in the relative importance of its driving forces. Accordingly, understanding gold requires not only identifying its traditional safe-haven role, but also recognizing how its function evolves across different macro regimes.
5.1 Short Term: A Macro Asset Constrained by Rates and the US Dollar
In the short term, gold remains highly sensitive to movements in real interest rates and the US dollar, as evidenced during the current episode of geopolitical tension.
The key constraint lies in the persistence of inflation uncertainty driven by energy prices. As long as inflation risks remain elevated, the expected path of interest rates is unlikely to adjust meaningfully downward. In such an environment, real rates may remain elevated or even rise further, increasing the opportunity cost of holding gold.
At the same time, the US dollar tends to retain relative strength amid uncertainty, adding an additional layer of pressure on gold prices.
As a result, gold in the short term behaves more like a macro trading asset, with its direction primarily shaped by:
Whether real rates show a clear downward inflection
Whether the US dollar enters a sustained weakening trend
Whether energy-driven inflation pressures begin to ease
Absent clear shifts in these variables, gold may exhibit range-bound or pressured price dynamics rather than a sustained directional trend.
5.2 Medium Term: From Reflation Constraints to a Potential Rate Inflection
Over the medium term, the key variable shifts from the level of interest rates to the direction of policy expectations.
If energy-driven inflation proves persistent, monetary policy may remain restrictive for longer, extending the period of pressure on gold. However, such constraints are inherently cyclical. Should any of the following conditions emerge:
A moderation in inflation pressures
A slowdown in economic growth
A policy shift toward supporting growth rather than prioritizing inflation
Market expectations for the policy path may begin to adjust downward, leading to a decline in real rates. In this process, the opportunity cost of holding gold would decrease, allowing its price sensitivity to re-emerge.
Historically, gold does not necessarily rally immediately after rates peak, but tends to perform more sustainably once the market forms a clearer consensus around a downward rate cycle. Therefore, in the medium term, the critical factor is not the current level of rates, but whether a directional shift in the rate cycle becomes established.
5.3 Long Term: Gold as a Structural Hedge Against Credit Repricing
From a long-term perspective, gold’s underlying logic remains intact and, in many respects, has strengthened.
In recent years, gold has demonstrated resilience even in a high real-rate environment. This suggests that its pricing framework is evolving. Gold is no longer solely an inflation hedge or a defensive asset; it is increasingly functioning as a hedge against broader credit and monetary system risks.
Several structural characteristics of the current macro environment reinforce this shift:
Persistently elevated global debt levels and increasing fiscal constraints
Ongoing trade-offs in monetary policy between inflation control and growth support
Rising geopolitical fragmentation and sanction-related risks
Against this backdrop, demand for gold is no longer driven purely by market participants, but is increasingly supported by structural buyers, including official sector demand and long-term allocators.
More importantly, gold is gradually becoming a mechanism through which markets express views on the stability of the US dollar-centric system. As marginal adjustments occur in the global reliance on a single reserve currency, gold—as a non-credit asset—may see its strategic role strengthened.
Therefore, from a long-term perspective, gold’s underlying drivers remain anchored in:
The reassessment of credit expansion and monetary stability
Shifts in global reserve asset allocation
The structural demand for hedging systemic risk
As long as these dynamics remain in place, gold retains the foundation for sustained, large-scale cyclical movements.
5.4 Summary: Short-Term Constraints, Long-Term Structural Support
Across time horizons, gold can be understood through a coherent framework:
In the short term, it is constrained by real rates and the US dollar;
In the medium term, its trajectory depends on whether a rate inflection emerges;
In the long term, it is anchored in structural uncertainty surrounding the global credit and monetary system.
Within this context, short-term volatility does not invalidate gold’s medium- to long-term logic. Rather, it reflects a phase in which rate-driven constraints temporarily dominate its pricing dynamics.
6 Risk Disclosure
The analysis in this report is based on currently available macro and market information, and future developments remain subject to multiple uncertainties, including but not limited to the following factors:
First, geopolitical conditions remain highly uncertain. Any unexpected escalation or rapid de-escalation in the Middle East could alter energy prices and market sentiment, leading to different pricing dynamics for gold.
Second, there is uncertainty surrounding the path of monetary policy. If inflation or economic data deviate materially from expectations, central bank policy trajectories may adjust accordingly, affecting real interest rates and the US dollar, and in turn influencing gold prices.
Third, energy price volatility remains a key variable. Significant fluctuations in oil prices could reshape inflation expectations and interest rate outlooks, thereby impacting gold’s performance.
In addition, changes in demand structure may introduce variability. This includes shifts in central bank gold purchases and investment flows, which may affect gold prices at different stages.
Finally, variations in market liquidity and risk appetite may amplify short-term price movements. During periods of heightened volatility, portfolio rebalancing across asset classes may lead to temporary divergences between gold prices and underlying fundamentals.
Disclaimer:
The Information presented above is for information purposes only, which shall not be intended as and does not constitute an offer to sell or solicitation for an offer to buy any securities or financial instrument or any advice or recommendation with respect to such securities or other financial instruments or investments. When making a decision about your investments, you should seek the advice of a professional financial adviser and carefully consider whether such investments are suitable for you in light of your own experience, financial position and investment objectives. The firm and its analysts do not have any material interest or conflict of interest with any stocks mentioned in this report.
IN NO EVENT SHALL SAHM CAPITAL FINANCIAL COMPANY BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES, LOSSES OR LIABILITIES INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, DIRECT OR INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, LOSSES OR LIABILITIES, IN CONNECTION WITH YOUR RELIANCE ON OR USE OR INABILITY TO USE THE INFORMATION PRESENTED ABOVE, EVEN IF YOU ADVISE US OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES, LOSSES OR EXPENSES.